← The DataQs Request Pack
HAULPROOF

DataQs Request Pack

Sample Hauling LLC · USDOT 9999999
Inspection report 0000000000 · Colorado · November 5, 2026
Prepared November 10, 2026
Sample. The carrier, report number, plates and ticket number in this sample are made up. A real pack carries the carrier's own inspection as it appears in FMCSA's records.
How to use this pack. 1) Check section 1 against the paper report your driver was given. 2) Read section 3 and find the situation that is true for you. If none is, there is nothing to file, and section 7 tells you when this inspection stops counting. 3) Copy the matching text from section 4, fill in the yellow blanks, and file it yourself on FMCSA's DataQs site (section 5). Filing is free.

1. What FMCSA's record shows

Motor carrierSample Hauling LLC · USDOT 9999999
Inspection report number0000000000
State that did the inspectionColorado (CO)
Date and timeNovember 5, 2026, 2:02 pm to 3:14 pm (as recorded)
PlaceFort Morgan, CO
Inspection levelLevel 2 (walk-around)
Added to FMCSA's recordsNovember 7, 2026
Carrier as written on the reportSample Hauling LLC, 100 Sample RD, Boise, ID
If this is not your company or your address, see situation B in section 3.
Shipper named on the reportSample Steel Supply
Unit 1truck tractor, plate SAMPLE1 (ID), VIN SAMPLEVIN00000001
Unit 2semi-trailer, plate SAMPLE2 (ID), VIN SAMPLEVIN00000002
#CodeViolation as recordedOnOut of serviceTicket number
1396.3A1-BALRAir Brake - Fails air loss rate testunit 1 (truck tractor, plate SAMPLE1 ID)YesSAMPLE-0001
2393.104B-CCargo - Damaged securement devices/tiedownsunit 2 (semi-trailer, plate SAMPLE2 ID)Nonone recorded

Source: FMCSA's public inspection and violation files, read November 10, 2026. The public file does not include the driver's name.

2. What it does to your record, and for how long

#CodeSafety score categoryFMCSA weightOut-of-service weightTotal
1396.3A1-BALRVehicle Maintenance4+26
2393.104B-CVehicle Maintenance1none1
Until May 5, 2027Each weight above counts three times in your safety score
Until November 5, 2027Counts twice
Until November 5, 2028Counts once. After this date the inspection is no longer used in the safety score
Until November 5, 2029Shown on the driver's Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) report, which employers pull when hiring
November 5, 2029Last day to ask for a review. States must review requests filed within 3 years of the inspection date

FMCSA's Safety Measurement System (methodology version 3.21) uses an inspection for 24 months. The weights of one inspection are capped at 30 in each category. An out-of-service violation gets 2 extra in the Vehicle Maintenance, Hours-of-Service, Driver Fitness and Hazardous Materials categories. FMCSA uses the scores to pick carriers for warning letters and investigations. The inspection data itself is public, and carrier-vetting tools used by freight brokers, and insurers, read it.

3. Can it be corrected? The situations that qualify

DataQs corrects records that are wrong. It does not remove a violation because it was minor, was repaired afterwards, or because you disagree with the rule. FMCSA's rule is that the burden of proof "rests entirely with the requestor", and that requests are rejected "without factual or legal justification" and the supporting documents. So find which situation below is true, and get the document that proves it, before you file.

A. A ticket was written, and the court outcome is in your favour

On this report: violation 1 (396.3A1-BALR), ticket no. SAMPLE-0001.

What the court doesWhat happens to the violation
Dismisses the ticket, or finds the driver not guiltyRemoved from the safety score and from the driver's PSP report
Convicts on a different charge (for example a plea to a lesser charge)Stays on the record, but its weight is set to 1 and it gets no out-of-service weight. The PSP report shows it as a conviction of a different charge
Convicts on the original charge, or the fine is paidStays at full weight

FMCSA does not find out what the court did. Someone has to send the court record through DataQs, and it applies to inspections on or after August 23, 2014. A request can be filed while the case is still open; the state may hold it until the court has decided.

Evidence: a certified copy of the court's disposition for that ticket (the clerk of the court named on the ticket issues it). It must show the ticket number, the charge and the outcome.

Whether to contest a ticket is your decision. If you want advice on the ticket itself, that is a question for a traffic attorney in Colorado.

B. The inspection is not yours

The truck was not running under your USDOT number that day. Typical cases: it was leased to another carrier and hauling under their authority; you had already sold or returned it; the officer wrote down the wrong USDOT number or company name.

Evidence: the lease agreement showing who was responsible for the truck on November 5, 2026; the bill of lading or rate confirmation for that load naming the carrier; a bill of sale or lease-termination paper dated before the inspection; the registration or cab card.

C. A violation does not match the facts

The condition was not there, the rule that was cited does not apply to your truck or your operation (an exemption, a different model year, a different kind of load), it was written against the wrong unit, or the same defect is listed twice.

Evidence: your paper copy of the inspection report; dated photos or video from the stop (phone or dash camera); a shop's dated measurement or inspection showing the part was within the limit as found; your electronic log or other records for an hours-of-service item; the manufacturer's specification; the text of the rule.

An invoice showing the defect was repaired afterwards proves the defect was there. It does not support a request.

D. The report has wrong information on it

A wrong date, place, plate, VIN, unit, driver, shipper or inspection level; or the copy in FMCSA's records differs from the paper report your driver was given. Compare section 1 of this pack with the paper report line by line.

Evidence: the paper report, plus the document that shows the right value (registration, bill of lading, log).

E. The same inspection is listed twice

Two report numbers for one stop. Check the inspection list on your public record: https://haulproof.ca/carriers/us/9999999

Evidence: both report numbers, with the date and place.

These do not qualify: the defect was fixed later; the driver did not know the rule; the officer was unfair or rude (that is a complaint to the agency, not a data correction); other carriers do the same; the fine has been paid.

No paper report? In DataQs you can ask the state for a copy first: start a new request and choose the inspection report request. Most states provide it.

4. Your request, ready to paste

Use the block that matches your situation. Fill in every yellow blank, delete the brackets, and keep to facts: what was the case, and which attached document shows it. One request can cover several violations on this inspection; state each one separately.

A. Court outcome for violation 1

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO I am asking for the citation result to be recorded for the following violation on this inspection, under FMCSA's adjudicated citations policy. Violation: 396.3A1-BALR Air Brake - Fails air loss rate test (line 1 of the report) State citation / ticket number: SAMPLE-0001 Court: [name of the court and county] Case or docket number: [number] Outcome: [dismissed / not guilty / convicted of a different charge: name the charge], decided on [date] A certified copy of the court's disposition is attached. Please record this result for the violation so that FMCSA's systems reflect it.

B. Not our inspection

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO This inspection is recorded against Sample Hauling LLC, USDOT 9999999, but the vehicle was not operating under our USDOT number at the time. On November 5, 2026, unit 1, plate SAMPLE1 ID, VIN SAMPLEVIN00000001; unit 2, plate SAMPLE2 ID, VIN SAMPLEVIN00000002 was [leased to / operated by / already sold to] [name of the other carrier or owner, and their USDOT number if they have one]. Attached: [lease agreement dated ... / bill of lading no. ... / bill of sale dated ...], which shows [what the document proves]. Please assign this inspection to the correct motor carrier and remove it from our record.

C. Violation 1 is not correct

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO I am asking for a review of this violation: 396.3A1-BALR Air Brake - Fails air loss rate test (unit 1 (truck tractor, plate SAMPLE1 ID)), listed as out of service. It is not correct because [one or two plain sentences of fact: what was actually the case, and how you know]. The rule cited requires [the part of the rule that matters, in its own words]. Attached: [each document, and what it shows: for example photo taken at the stop at 2:20 pm showing ..., shop measurement dated ...]. Please [remove this violation / correct it to ...].

C. Violation 2 is not correct

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO I am asking for a review of this violation: 393.104B-C Cargo - Damaged securement devices/tiedowns (unit 2 (semi-trailer, plate SAMPLE2 ID)). It is not correct because [one or two plain sentences of fact: what was actually the case, and how you know]. The rule cited requires [the part of the rule that matters, in its own words]. Attached: [each document, and what it shows: for example photo taken at the stop at 2:20 pm showing ..., shop measurement dated ...]. Please [remove this violation / correct it to ...].

D. Wrong information on the report

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO The inspection report contains incorrect information. [Field, for example: plate number of unit 2] is recorded as [what the record says]. The correct value is [the right value], as shown in the attached [document]. Please correct the record.

E. Duplicate inspection

Motor carrier: Sample Hauling LLC (USDOT 9999999) Inspection report number: 0000000000 State: CO Date: November 5, 2026 Location: Fort Morgan, CO This inspection appears twice in FMCSA's records: as report number 0000000000 and as report number [the other report number]. Both are the same stop: same date, place, vehicle and driver. Please remove the duplicate.
Attach everything the first time. If you bring new evidence at a later review stage, DataQs sends the request back to the first stage.

5. How to file it (free)

  1. Go to dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov. A motor carrier or owner-operator signs in through the FMCSA Portal (portal.fmcsa.dot.gov, then DataQs under "Available FMCSA Systems"). If DataQs is not listed there, add the role "DataQs Secure Access" in your Portal profile. A driver who is not an owner-operator signs in with Login.gov.
  2. Click Start a New Request and choose the inspection category. Search for the report: state CO, report number 0000000000, date November 5, 2026. If the number on your paper report starts with two letters, leave the letters out.
  3. Choose the reason that matches your situation in section 3. The tool walks you through the screens.
  4. Paste your text, upload your documents, check the "Ready to Submit" panel and submit. You get a confirmation email with a Request ID.
  5. Follow it under My DataQs. To add a document later, open the request and choose "Add Response / Documents" under "Take Action".

DataQs help: DataQs@dot.gov or (877) 688-2984, option 1.

Nobody needs your FMCSA login, PIN or password to help you with this. HaulProof never asks for them. Do not give them to anyone who offers to file for you.

6. What happens next, with your dates

StageThe ruleYour date
You submitThe state must open the request within 7 daysSubmitted on
Initial reviewDecision within 21 days of submission. The inspecting officer cannot be the only one deciding to leave the record unchangedDecision due by
ReconsiderationIf the record was not corrected, you have 30 days to ask: open the request and choose "Re-open Request" under "Take Action". Decided within 21 days by a person or panel that is not the inspecting officer or their direct supervisorAsk by
Decision due by
Final reviewYou have 30 days to ask again. Decided within 45 days by a senior decision-maker who took no part in the first two stages. After this the state's decision is final for FMCSAAsk by
Decision due by

These time limits apply to requests submitted on or after September 18, 2026. When a correction is made, the safety score and the PSP report are refreshed once a month, so allow up to about six weeks to see it.

7. If nothing on it is wrong

Then there is nothing to file, and that is worth knowing. Without a correction, its weight drops by a third on May 5, 2027, by another third on November 5, 2027, and it leaves the safety score on November 5, 2028. In most categories every later inspection that finds no violation lowers your measure, because the score divides your weighted violations by your number of inspections.

You can get a free email whenever anything changes on your public record: open https://haulproof.ca/carriers/us/9999999 and choose "Watch this carrier".

8. Sources, and what this pack is not

This pack is general information prepared from public records and from FMCSA's published procedures as read on November 10, 2026. It is not legal advice, and no outcome is promised: the state decides on the evidence you send. HaulProof is a private company, a service of A3E Ecosystem Inc, #503-7700 Hurontario St, Unit 531, Brampton, ON L6Y 4M3, Canada, and is not affiliated with FMCSA or any government agency. Questions about this pack, or a refund within 7 days of purchase: reply to the email it came with, or write to hello@haulproof.ca.